Nancy Pelosi=s
decision for so long not to pursue impeachment against Donald Trump The basis of this wisdom is the
1998 Republican impeachment of Bill Clinton.
The real lesson of 1998 and other prior impeachments may far different than what the national
media and Washington insiders may believe, and, in fact, past impeachments may
provide little clue to what might happen this time.was based
on national media Washington, D.C. conventional wisdom that it will backlash
against Democrats, ensuring his reelection in 2020, if not the loss of the
House.
Each impeachment and trial is politically unique, taking
place under specific factual circumstances.
Consider the three impeachments of presidents that have thus far
occurred.
The first was Andrew Johnson in 1868. He was a Tennessee Democrat, Abraham Lincoln=s 1864 vice-president who became president upon the latter=s assassination. Lincoln chose him as appeasement to the
border states to hold them within the Union.
Yet Johnson opposed the abolition of slavery, impeded Reconstruction, and did his best to stymie it
via vetoes, non-administration, and the firing of holdover Lincoln appointees.
While the 11 Articles of Impeachment that the House voted on were mostly
about the firing of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton contrary to congressional
law, the real issue was a congressional-presidential fight over Reconstruction.
The impeachment came at a time when many southern states from
Confederacy were effectively under federal control, with 10 of them not readmitted
for representation in Congress. The
House of Representatives voted 126 to 47 (with 17 members not voting), to
impeach. Given how few Democrats in the
House, this was mostly a Republican effort.
The Senate acquitted Johnson by one vote. It was a body heavily dominated by
Republicans.
There was no partisan backlash among voters that appeared in
the 1968 election. The Republican
Ulysses S. Grant won the presidency, Republicans lost two seats in the House,
the Democrats picked up 20, mostly from reseating of the South. In the Senate, Democrats gained no seats
while the Republicans picked up 20.
In July 1974 the House Judiciary Committee voted on three
Articles of Impeachment against Nixon, for obstruction of justice, abuse of
power, and contempt of Congress. These
articles arose from Nixon=s ordering of the Watergate break-in and
seeking to hide the crime and hinder congressional investigations. The Committee
recommended the three articles to
the full House, mostly along party lines. Before a full impeachment vote, Nixon
resigned. However come November
Democrats retained a large majority in the House even as they lost 13 seats,
while in the Senate they increased their
control by five seats.
Finally, in 1998 House Republicans led by Speaker Newt
Gingrich impeached Bill Clinton on
Articles of Impeachment arising out of his perjury before a grand jury and
obstruction of justice. The charges were
the result of investigations undertaken by special prosecutor Kenneth Starr and
whether Clinton had lied under oath about a sexual relationship with Monica
Lewinsky. Impeachment proceedings began
before the 1998 election although the actual vote to impeach occurred in
December. The vote followed mostly party
lines. The Senate trial began in January
1999, concluding in February with an acquittal again mostly along party lines.
What is significant about the Clinton impeachment is that
Newt Gingrich reportedly said that Republicans would pick up 30 seats by doing
it. They lost five and eventually
Gingrich had to resign, some claim, because of this. In the Senate, Republicans lost no seats.
Clinton went on to serve out his term and left office in 2001 with one of the
highest presidential approval ratings in years.
The conventional wisdom from 1998 was that the Republican
impeachment was viewed as purely partisan, mobilizing Democratic voters to
Clinton=s and their
party=s
defense. This is the lesson or specter
that supposedly haunts Democrats nowBimpeach
Trump and fail and he survives stronger, wins re-election, and Democrats pay in
the 2020 elections.
Yet this morale is too simplistic. As much as 1998 was so different from 1868
and 1974, so it 2019 or 2020. Yes, all
three previous impeachments have been brought by the opposition party and many
of the votes fell along partisan lines.
Perhaps this means that opposition parties are doing what they are
supposed to doBhelp
check the other party. All three took
place in highly partisan times, and all three centered on
congressional-presidential struggles for power.
But there the parallels end, especially with 1998 and the present.
Trump is less popular now than Clinton was at impeachment
time. Lying about a sexual relationship
(at least then) was seen as less serious than potential Articles of Impeachment
against Trump involving abuse of power connected to his conversation with the Ukrainian
president. America now is a different
kind of partisan country than 1998. It
could also be the case this impeachment mobilizes Democrats, especially after a
probable Republican acquittal in the Senate.
Also, other variables, such as a slowing economy, concern over foreign
affairs, and a host of other issues might mean that 2020 is far different than
1998.
But also, given that
the 1998 impeachment occurred after the elections that year, it might be better
to look at what happened in the 2000 elections where Republicans lost two seats
in the House, five in the Senate, but won the presidency in a contested George
Bush/Al Gore election that came down to Florida. In reality from 1998 to 2000 Republicans only
lost seven House and five Senate seats and took by the presidency. Yes sets were lost, but it is hard to
attribute solely to Clinton=s
impeachment. The real issue may have
been Gingrich=s
over-promise and creating unreasonable expectations.
The point is that there is no one clear message about
partisan backlash that can be told from the three prior impeachments. This too includes 1998. The conventional wisdom that a potential
coming impeachment of Trump will necessarily benefit him and Republicans and
hurt Democrats is either groundless or speculative at best, with at least a
potential scenario it helps Democrats in 2020.
Very thoughtful, and interesting, as is all your writing. It is good to hear from you!
ReplyDelete