What did we
learn from the Minneapolis and St. Paul elections, specifically with Jacob Frey
and Melvin Carter, respectively, elected as the new mayors of the two cities? The simple answer is that what happened in these two cities has significance well beyond their borders.
Turn first to
Minneapolis. It is less clear that this is an election endorsing Frey or
voting for him than it was one rejecting the incumbent Betsy Hodges.
After the first round of voting Hodges received 18.1% of the first-choice
votes, meaning more than 80% voted against her. The voters clearly did
not like her style, handling of issues such as police use of force or crime or
her oversight of the construction on Nicollet Mall. But that did not mean
that any one candidate emerged as the alternative to her. Council member
Jacob Frey did not even receive 25% of the vote. In fact, the top five
candidates split up 96% of the vote, with each receive more than 15% of the
vote.
What emerged
was a city polarized and divided. It is not clear that Frey enjoys
widespread support of most of the constituencies in the city, and he clear has
a long way to go in terms of his ability to reach out to the business
community. In addition, given his lack of administrative experience and really,
his general lack of experience in government (only his tenure as a city council
member), and the fact that the mayor’s position in Minneapolis is relatively
weak, it will be a challenge for him to govern. This is especially the
case when it looks also as if the city council will have several new comers and
it too is divided. Frey won less because of his positions (in many ways
his positions were not so different from Hodges) and campaign and more because
Hodges was unpopular, the opposition was divided, and he was the strongest of
those who were not the mayor.
But perhaps one
of the less appreciated or overlooked events that took place in the Minneapolis
elections was that City Council President Barb Johnson lost. This is an enormous blow and loss of
institutional knowledge and skill in Minneapolis. She held together a factional city council
since 2006, and her loss means both a new mayor and council president taking
over at the same time. The challenge
will be to figure out how to govern in Minneapolis.
St. Paul’s
election was a surprise in the sense that almost everyone thought it would be a
close election between Melvin Carter and Pat Harris. In the end Carter won for
several reasons. He had a better
campaign, name recognition, and more DFL endorsements that were
meaningful. But also, Pat Harris’s
campaign was not as good as many assumed.
But the real game-changer was an ad by the Police union (Building a
Better St. Paul) that accused Melvin Carter’s stolen guns as being involved in
crimes. This was perceived as a Donald
Trumpish type of race-baiting that backfired.
It energized many to vote and probably also turned away some from Pat
Harris who was stuck. If he fully
disavowed the group and ad then he repudiated his base, if he did not act
aggressively enough he would be seen as endorsing this attack. In the end, he waffled, and it hurt him.
Electing Frey
and Carter as mayors of the two largest cities in the state is significant for
several reasons. First, they are young, and it signals a passing of the DFL
leadership mantle to a new generation.
This started already in Minneapolis four years ago. In St. Paul, with Carter elected and Coleman
out, the latter may well be the last White Irish Catholic mayor in the city,
recognizing the changing politics and demographics in that city. Second, both are liberal. There liberalism will push the two cities
further to the left on a range of issues.
This will have an impact not just in the two cities, but both regionally
and state-wide. Regionally, if both
cities move to establish living wages for employment in their towns it could
have an impact in terms of how other cities in the region have to respond. Additionally, if the two cities move further
to the left, it potentially causes a political schism between the DFL there and
across the rest of the state. It also
sets in motion a potential stronger urban-rural or DFL-Republican conflict in
the state.
A Note on my Predictions
So how well did I predict the
mayoral elections in the two cities? In
the end I got some things right and some wrong.
There were no surveys or polls to use to help make election predictions,
so I was shooting in the dark, so to speak. In a September 21, 2017 blog I made the following predictions:
Predicted:
Frey 26%
Hodges 24%
Dehn 20%
Hoch 15%
Levy-Pounds 10%
Hodges 24%
Dehn 20%
Hoch 15%
Levy-Pounds 10%
Final first-choice votes
Frey 24.97%
Hoch 19.27%
Hodges 18.08%
Dehn 17.34%
Levy-Pounds 15.06%
The final order of votes after RCV was
applied, had Frey winning, followed by Dehn, Hoch, Hodges, and then
Levy-Pounds. I clearly overestimated support for Hodges and underestimated that
for Hoch and Levy-Pounds. I let you
decide how good my predictions were.
No comments:
Post a Comment